Cookies
Potřebujeme váš souhlas k využití jednotlivých dat, aby se vám mimo jiné mohly ukazovat informace týkající se vašich zájmů. Souhlas udělíte kliknutím na tlačítko „OK“.
ASTM E1334-95(1999)
Standard Practice for Rating the Serviceability of a Building or Building-Related Facility
Automaticky přeložený název:
Standardní praktiky pro Hodnocení provozuschopnosti budovy nebo budovy souvisejících Facility
NORMA vydána dne 10.10.1999
Informace o normě:
Označení normy: ASTM E1334-95(1999)
Poznámka: NEPLATNÁ
Datum vydání normy: 10.10.1999
Kód zboží: NS-41340
Počet stran: 12
Přibližná hmotnost: 36 g (0.08 liber)
Země: Americká technická norma
Kategorie: Technické normy ASTM
Anotace textu normy ASTM E1334-95(1999) :
Keywords:
building, design (of building), facility, function, facility occupants, office, performance, rating, rating scale, remodel, rehabilitation, requirements, serviceability, use, ICS Number Code 91.040.01 (Buildings in general)
Doplňující informace
| 1. Scope | ||||||
|
1.1 This practice is a definitive procedure for rating the serviceability of a building or building-related facility, that is, for ascertaining its capability to perform the functions for which it is designed, used, or required to be used. A separate scale is used for each topic of serviceability. For each topic, a serviceability level is ascertained. Overall serviceability is expressed as a profile of levels (that is, not as a single number), and may be presented as a bar chart. 1.2 This practice is not intended to be used for regulatory purposes. 1.3 This practice can be used to rate the serviceability of a building or building-related facility that has been planned but not yet built, or which is about to be remodelled or rehabilitated, for example, for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared. 1.4 This practice specifies how to ascertain serviceability levels for a specific building, but not what would cause a building to be rated at a given level. That information is found in standard classifications for specific topics of serviceability that contain a set of requirement and rating scales. This practice and one or more such standard classifications are mutually dependent. Each requires the other. The format of such standard classifications, and of related information, is described in Appendix X1. An example of the scales written for such classifications is given in Appendix X3. 1.5 This practice does not cover building evaluation, building condition reports, nor diagnosis of performance; nor does it cover instruments, tools or quality of measurements for evaluation, condition reports, or diagnosis of performance. 1.6 This practice applies only to facilities that are building constructions, parts thereof, or building-related. While this practice may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this practice. 1.7 The process for creating or adapting a set of classifications for a specific facility type or category is outside the scope of this practice. 1.8 This practice contains the following information: Section Introduction Scope 1 Referenced Documents 2 Terminology 3 Summary of Practice 4 Significance and Use 5 Procedure 6 Keywords 7 Flow Chart for Rating Serviceability of a Building or Building- Fig. 1 Related Facility for a Specific Purpose Format of a Classification for the Serviceability of a Facility X1 Type or Category Example: Checklist for Tour of a Building X2 Example: Part of a Pair of Serviceability Scales for One Topic X3 Example: Part of a Pair of Matching Serviceability Profiles Pres- X4 ented as Barcharts Example: Titles of Aspects, Topics, and Features X5 Example: List of Common Generic Types of Facility X6 |
||||||
| 2. Referenced Documents | ||||||
|
Doporučujeme:
Aktualizace technických norem
Chcete mít jistotu, že používáte pouze platné technické normy?
Nabízíme Vám řešení, které Vám zajistí měsíční přehled o aktuálnosti norem, které používáte.
Chcete vědět více informací? Podívejte se na tuto stránku.
