Potřebujeme váš souhlas k využití jednotlivých dat, aby se vám mimo jiné mohly ukazovat informace týkající se vašich zájmů. Souhlas udělíte kliknutím na tlačítko „OK“.
Standard Test Method for Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test for Cohesive Soils
Přeložit název
NORMA vydána dne 1.4.2020
Označení normy: ASTM D4767-11(2020)
Datum vydání normy: 1.4.2020
Kód zboží: NS-990468
Počet stran: 14
Přibližná hmotnost: 42 g (0.09 liber)
Země: Americká technická norma
Kategorie: Technické normy ASTM
Zemní práce. Hloubicí práce. Budování základů. Podzemní práce
Keywords:
back pressure saturation, cohesive soil, consolidated undrained strength, strain-controlled loading, stress-strain relationships, total and effective stresses,, ICS Number Code 93.020 (Earth works. Excavations. Foundation construction. Underground works)
Significance and Use | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.1 The shear strength of a saturated soil in triaxial compression depends on the stresses applied, time of consolidation, strain rate, and the stress history experienced by the soil. 4.2 In this test method, the shear characteristics are measured under undrained conditions and is applicable to field conditions where soils that have been fully consolidated under one set of stresses are subjected to a change in stress without time for further consolidation to take place (undrained condition), and the field stress conditions are similar to those in the test method. Note 1: If the strength is required for the case where the
soil is not consolidated during testing prior to shear, refer to
Test Method D2850 or Test
Method D2166/D2166M.
4.3 Using the pore-water pressure measured during the test, the shear strength determined from this test method can be expressed in terms of effective stress. This shear strength may be applied to field conditions where full drainage can occur (drained conditions) or where pore pressures induced by loading can be estimated, and the field stress conditions are similar to those in the test method. 4.4 The shear strength determined from the test expressed in terms of total stresses (undrained conditions) or effective stresses (drained conditions) is commonly used in embankment stability analyses, earth pressure calculations, and foundation design. Note 2: Notwithstanding the statements on precision and bias
contained in this test method. The precision of this test method is
dependent on the competence of the personnel performing it and the
suitability of the equipment and facilities used. Agencies which
meet the criteria of Practice D3740 are generally considered capable of
competent testing. Users of this test method are cautioned that
compliance with Practice D3740 does not ensure reliable testing.
Reliable testing depends on several factors; Practice D3740 provides a means of evaluating some
of those factors.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Scope | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.1 This test method covers the determination of strength and stress-strain relationships of a cylindrical specimen of either an intact, reconstituted, or remolded saturated cohesive soil. Specimens are isotropically consolidated and sheared in compression without drainage at a constant rate of axial deformation (strain controlled). 1.2 This test method provides for the calculation of total and effective stresses, and axial compression by measurement of axial load, axial deformation, and pore-water pressure. 1.3 This test method provides data useful in determining strength and deformation properties of cohesive soils such as Mohr strength envelopes and Young's modulus. Generally, three specimens are tested at different effective consolidation stresses to define a strength envelope. 1.4 The determination of strength envelopes and the development of relationships to aid in interpreting and evaluating test results are beyond the scope of this test method and must be performed by a qualified, experienced professional. 1.5 All observed and calculated values shall conform to the guidelines for significant digits and rounding established in Practice D6026. 1.5.1 The methods used to specify how data are collected, calculated, or recorded in this standard are regarded as the industry standard. In addition, they are representative of the significant digits that generally should be retained. The procedures used do not consider material variation, purpose for obtaining the data, special purpose studies or any consideration of end use. It is beyond the scope of this test method to consider significant digits used in analysis methods for engineering design. 1.6 Units—The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are provided for information only and are not considered standard. Reporting of test results in units other than SI shall not be regarded as nonconformance with this test method. 1.6.1 The gravitational system of inch-pound units is used when dealing with inch-pound units. In this system, the pound (lbf) represents a unit of force (weight), while the unit for mass is slugs. The slug unit is not given, unless dynamic (F = ma) calculations are involved. 1.6.2 It is common practice in the engineering/construction profession to concurrently use pounds to represent both a unit of mass (lbm) and of force (lbf). This implicitly combines two separate systems of units; that is, the absolute system and the gravitational system. It is scientifically undesirable to combine the use of two separate sets of inch-pound units within a single standard. As stated, this standard includes the gravitational system of inch-pound units and does not use/present the slug unit for mass. However, the use of balances or scales recording pounds of mass (lbm) or recording density in lbm/ft3 shall not be regarded as nonconformance with this standard. 1.6.3 The terms density and unit weight are often used interchangeably. Density is mass per unit volume whereas unit weight is force per unit volume. In this standard density is given only in SI units. After the density has been determined, the unit weight is calculated in SI or inch-pound units, or both. 1.7 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.8 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. Referenced Documents | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Poslední aktualizace: 22.11.2024 (Počet položek: 2 206 568)
© Copyright 2024 NORMSERVIS s.r.o.