ASTM G82-98(2009) - 1.5.2009
 
Significance and Use

When two dissimilar metals in electrical contact are exposed to a common electrolyte, one of the metals can undergo increased corrosion while the other can show decreased corrosion. This type of accelerated corrosion is referred to as galvanic corrosion. Because galvanic corrosion can occur at a high rate, it is important that a means be available to alert the user of products or equipment that involve the use of dissimilar metal combinations in an electrolyte of the possible effects of galvanic corrosion.

One method that is used to predict the effects of galvanic corrosion is to develop a galvanic series by arranging a list of the materials of interest in order of observed corrosion potentials in the environment and conditions of interest. The metal that will suffer increased corrosion in a galvanic couple in that environment can then be predicted from the relative position of the two metals in the series.

Types of Galvanic Series:

Oe type of Galvanic Series lists the metals of interest in order of their corrosion potentials, starting with the most active (electronegative) and proceeding in order to the most noble (electropositive). The potentials themselves (versus an appropriate reference half-cell) are listed so that the potential difference between metals in the series can be determined. This type of Galvanic Series has been put in graphical form as a series of bars displaying the range of potentials exhibited by the metal listed opposite each bar. Such a series is illustrated in Fig. 1.

The second type of galvanic series is similar to the first in that it lists the metals of interest in order of their corrosion potentials. The actual potentials themselves are not specified, however. Thus, only the relative position of materials in the series is known and not the magnitude of their potential difference. Such a series is shown in Fig. 2.

Use of a Galvanic Series:

Generally, upon coupling two metals in the Galvanic Series, the more active (electronegative) metal will have a tendency to undergo increased corrosion while the more noble (electropositive) metal will have a tendency to undergo reduced corrosion.

Usually, the further apart two metals are in the series, and thus the greater the potential difference between them, the greater is the driving force for galvanic corrosion. All other factors being equal, and subject to the precautions in Section 5, this increased driving force frequently, although not always, results in a greater degree of galvanic corrosion.


Note—Dark boxes indicate active behavior of active-passive alloys.

FIG. 1 Galvanic Series of Various Metals in Flowing Seawater at 2.4 to 4.0 m/s for 5 to 15 Days at 5 to 30°C (Redrawn from Original) (see Footnote 5)

¦
ACTIVE ENDMagnesium
()Magnesium Alloys
Zinc
¦Galvanized Steel
¦Aluminum 1100
¦Aluminum 6053
¦Alclad
¦Cadmium
¦Aluminum 2024 (4.5 Cu, 1.5 Mg, 0.6 Mn)
¦Mild Steel
¦Wrought Iron
¦Cast Iron
¦13 % Chromium Stainless Steel
¦ Type 410 (Active)
¦18-8 Stainless Steel
¦ Type 304 (Active)
¦18-12-3 Stainless Steel
¦ Type 316 (Active)
¦Lead-Tin Solders
¦Lead
¦Tin
¦Muntz Metal
¦Manganese Bronze
¦Naval Brass
¦Nickel (Active)
¦76 Ni-16 Cr-7 Fe alloy (Active)
¦60 Ni-30 Mo-6 Fe-1 Mn
¦Yellow Brass
¦Admirality Brass
Aluminum Brass
¦Red Brass
¦Copper
¦Silicon Bronze
¦70:30 Cupro Nickel
¦G-Bronze
¦M-Bronze
¦Silver Solder
¦Nickel (Passive)
¦76 Ni-16Cr-7 Fe
¦ Alloy (Passive)
¦67 Ni-33 Cu Alloy (Monel)
¦13 % Chromium Stainless Steel
¦Type 410 (Passive)
¦Titanium
¦18-8 Stainless Steel
¦ Type 304 (Passive)
¦18-12-3 Stainless Steel
Type 316 (Passive)
(+)Silver
NOBLE orGraphite
PASSIVE ENDGold
Platinum
FIG. 2 Galvanic Series of Various Metals Exposed to Seawater (see Footnote 3)

 
1. Scope

1.1 This guide covers the development of a galvanic series and its subsequent use as a method of predicting the effect that one metal can have upon another metal can when they are in electrical contact while immersed in an electrolyte. Suggestions for avoiding known pitfalls are included.

1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.

1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific precautionary statements are given in Section 5.

 
2. Referenced Documents

G15-08

Standard Terminology Relating to Corrosion and Corrosion Testing (Withdrawn 2010)

G3-14(2019)

Standard Practice for Conventions Applicable to Electrochemical Measurements in Corrosion Testing

G16-13(2019)

Standard Guide for Applying Statistics to Analysis of Corrosion Data

G71-81(2019)

Standard Guide for Conducting and Evaluating Galvanic Corrosion Tests in Electrolytes